This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
Overall: Great work! For ease of other reviewers; the hook comes from page 178 of the source (and doing the calculation to come up with the margin of victory from the vote totals clearly falls under the WP:CALC exception to NOR). From revision 1285445119, I spotchecked refs 1 (in both uses of the citation) and 3; both supported the statement made and were not copyvios. Earwig comes up spotless. While not a problem, note that the source used for the hook in the article (ref 5) is different from the source used in this DYK. Ref 5 is not available gratis on the net, so I AGF that it supports the statement. Approved ALT0, and thank you for your work countering systemic bias on WP :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)19:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Great work! For ease of other reviewers; the hook comes from page 178 of the source (and doing the calculation to come up with the margin of victory from the vote totals clearly falls under the WP:CALC exception to NOR). From revision 1285445119, I spotchecked refs 1 (in both uses of the citation) and 3; both supported the statement made and were not copyvios. Earwig comes up spotless. While not a problem, note that the source used for the hook in the article (ref 5) is different from the source used in this DYK. Ref 5 is not available gratis on the net, so I AGF that it supports the statement.